I was saddened to hear of the death of Farrah Fawcett. She was a really classy, beautiful and talented lady.
Conversely, on hearing Michael Jackson died at about the same time, I think I felt relief. My reaction was along the lines of, thank god, another psycho pedophile has been taken out of action.
When Farrah Fawcett debuted on TV, a lot of people dismissed her as just another pretty face - one of the "Charlie's Angels." It was hard to draw a different conclusion back then - face it - Charlie's Angels was the Baywatch of the mid-70's. The whole premise of the show was to put beautiful women in improbably situations to showcase their good looks. Not much plot. Terrible writing and acting. But great looking babes. It's a TV show formula that's been proven to work, over and over.
Reinforcing that no-talent/beautiful airhead impression was the iconic poster she did - and the hysteria about her trademark hair.
But then to the amazement of everyone, she left the show after only a year.
Over the next 30 years she proved her worth as an actress, giving some really great performances in shows off Broadway, and critically acclaimed TV movies like the Burning Bed, and Extremities.
I watched her final movie, the documentary of her death from cancer last night - Farrah's Story - and was overwhelmed at the courage and class she displayed. Right to the very bitter end.
She's a person and a talent that will be sorely missed.
Michael Jackson, on the other hand, was a bizarre, drug-addicted, surgery-addicted, whacked-out child-molester, and it's beyond me how it seems so many people seem to have forgotten that.
While I was never into his music - I've never cared for pop music - I recognize his contributions to music, generally. But I don't think that on the whole, that outweighs his negative side and the harm or evil he did.
Sleeping with eight year old boys and giving them "Jesus Juice" is flat out wrong - yes, even evil. He bought his way out of the pedophile charges, but maybe while he was cleared legally, the only thing that does for me is point out one of the major flaws in our legal system - which is if you have enough money and connections, you can buy your way out of pretty much anything (such as even killing your wife and her lover, like OJ Simpson).
Getting little kids drunk and having sex with them is disgusting and reprehensible and evil. If it was left up to me, I would have seen Jackson locked up in jail in the general population and hoped he would be slowly, butt-fucked to death by the other inmates. A fitting and proper end for a child molester.
Just because a person may at one time have been a brilliant artist is not a valid reason to forget or forgive their twisted, evil nature.
Adolf Hitler, for example, was a pretty fair painter. Yes, that's one of Hitler's paintings at the top of this page.
Perhaps next, we should have a Hitler Painting Retrospective to celebrate the fallen dictator's brilliant career as a painter (before he became an evil dictator/serial murder)? I think not.
The world is a better place with Michael Jackson dead.
Comments (1)
1.You really got to admit that he was the most famous person ,since you that hate him know just what happened with so many details. 2.To make it clearer:there are 2 cases that refer to MJ and pedophilia.1A family threaten to sue him in 1993 ,because he molested their son.2.There is a criminal trial against him for him raping a boy in 2005. 1993 case:He pays 20 million to the kid & his family so they don't sue him for pedophilia and that's all.And many people say:he paid ,then he's guilty.First of all if an asshole rapes your underage kid what do you do?You get 20 million and say fine,for some more money you can rape him once or twise more.If someone molests my kid I would sue his ass and make sure that he stays in jail till he dies. 2.When someone kills a person and pays his family some money what do you think that the goverment and the court does?They say fine ,since you've paid and the agree's not to sue you ,ok.No matter how much you've paid the family has no right to make a civil case against you ,but the court starts a criminal one and you got to prison no matter. So naturally neverlend ,Jackson and everything else was searched.They found NO DNA ,NO EVIDENCE ,no nothing.Otherwise there was going to be a criminal case against him and he would be in jail. Of course there are other things like the kid admiting that everything was a scam 2 years ago,because of that him not talking to his parents since 10 years ,and a phone conversation in which the father says that he's gonna make big money and his gonna ruin Jackson...
2.2005 case.Here the goverment serches neverland ,Jackson ,questions some whitneses and the family that wants to start a trial against MJ.And they start a criminal trial.There are many things to say about it.Too many facts that the family states don't match and are false.99/100% of the whitnesses against Michael are ex,fired employees from Neverlend,or people that lost cases for money against MJ.The D.A tries to falsify evidence against Michael(showing a porn magazine to the kid in court ,without him wearing gloves and THEN thesting it for prints).The fact that the mother has other false cases she started just for money.The fact that they claim MJ raped the kid after the film Living with MJ,the fact that they made a video before the trial in which they say that he's 100% innocent...But the main thing is that we have a verdict that says :NOT GUILTY. And of course everybody could say :yes ,but i think he's a pedophile But 1 of all you disagree with the american justice system. 2.Why don't you think for a moment that he's innocent?Why don't you look from the other point of view?Don't you know that people can LIE just for money?After all the man had billions of dollars.Why work work when you can sue Michael Jackson? 3.MJ was beaten by his dad,he had to perform all the time since the age of 5.He was fowelled by paparazzi all the time since the age of 5.He had no normal life.Imagine if you can't do anything wrong because 100 photographers are taking your picture all the time.He had no childhood at all.That's why he loved kids.They're very innocent,fair and good.They were his only friends.But in todays world there's no such thing as innocent and pure.A grown man plays with a kid.There has to be something really wrong here.
And i don't think that if he was a pedo he would have donated so MUCH money to charity and specifically to kids charity.He would say he loves kids ,and would visit sick kids and help them.If i was a pedophile i would do my "work" hidden and quick and hope nobody understands.And would definetly not say that i love kids in fron of the whole world. I have made tons of research and read a couple of books before forming my opinion.I think everybody who says MJ is a pedo should do the same ,because: Just because you read it in a magazine Or see it on the TV screen Don't make it factual
Posted by eva123
|
January 27, 2011 5:28 PM
Posted on January 27, 2011 17:28